![]() |
Roughly 100 tea partiers protested Senator Lindsey Graham’s (R-SC) plans to help draft – along with global warming alarmists John Kerry (D-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) – a cap-and-tax law to restrict U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. The Saturday protests came in response to a Washington Post article reporting Graham’s recent assertion that “cap and tax is dead” is nothing more than an attempt to change the public relations language of plans to tax and restrict carbon dioxide emissions.
Following up on Graham’s Washington, D.C. political maneuvering, the New York Times reported yesterday,” Graham remains committed to putting a price on carbon emissions. And the proposal he is working on [with Kerry and Lieberman] is likely to utilize the cap-and-trade mechanism” despite his assertion that cap-and-trade is dead.
“I have no problem with trading as long as you don’t devastate the economy,” Graham said in a Tuesday interview, reported by the Times.
“Graham explained his reason for declaring ‘cap-and-trade is dead’ is more about framing the debate for public consumption than anything else,” the Times observed.
Last weekend’s tea party protests were not the first time Graham provoked the wrath of the tea party.
In October 2009 Graham co-authored a New York Times editorial with Kerry saying, “climate change is real and threatens our economy and national security.” Graham and Kerry called for cap-and-trade restrictions on “big polluters” that the Obama treasury department acknowledges would cost the average U.S. household approximately $3,000 per year. Tea partiers led citizen protests against Graham when he returned to South Carolina, and the Charlston County and Lexington County Republicans soon thereafter censored Graham.
Graham's recent claim that “cap-and-trade is dead” may have been designed to make South Carolinians forget his past support for cap-and-tax carbon dioxide restrictions. Now, tea partiers realize, Graham was merely engaging in creative word play, and still supports such restrictions.
WHAT'S NEWJim Lakely - July 22, 2010
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) conceded Thursday that the comprehensive Kerry-Lieberman cap-and-tax “climate change” bill is dead ... (read more)
Fergus Hodgson - July 20, 2010
Obama administration BP cleanup fund director Kenneth Feinberg told three Louisiana town hall gatherings in one day—in Houma, Port Sulphur, and Lafitte— ... (read more)
Paul Fisher and Jim Johnston - July 20, 2010
A favorite political sport in recent years has been to use the judicial system to demonize business people for fun and profit at the polls. The treatment ... (read more)
Natasha Altamirano - July 19, 2010
At least 13 states are considering enacting taxes on plastic and paper bags used at grocery stores and carryout restaurants, but a Tax Foundation report ... (read more)
Jim Johnston - September 18, 2007
Economist Jim Johnston explains the differences between political markets, such as the one created for trading sulfur dioxide emissions, and real markets, ... (read more)
H. Sterling Burnett - July 13, 2010
Alaska state officials are objecting to the Obama administration’s decision to list more than 187,000 square miles—almost the entire U.S. polar ... (read more)
Sarah McIntosh - July 13, 2010
The town of Concord, Massachusetts has banned the sale of bottled water, effective January 2011. Concord passed the measure in response to environmental ... (read more)
Thomas Cheplick - July 13, 2010
Environmental activists are stepping up their criticism of ethanol tax breaks, claiming the subsidies provide few if any environmental benefits and needlessly ... (read more)
Alyssa Carducci - July 13, 2010
Gulf Coast states are taking the initiative in addressing the BP oil spill, as the federal government continues to do little to protect states from advancing ... (read more)
Bonner R. Cohen - July 13, 2010
The Connecticut legislature seriously considered legislation rolling back the state’s aggressive renewable power requirement, but a back-and-forth ... (read more)
POLICYBOT: ENVIRONMENT |